Which gpu for vr reddit. A CPU upgrade will be the cheapest, and easiest.

Which gpu for vr reddit 1070, 1080, 2060, 70, 80 is ok. I'm all for AMD, have been using their GPUs for years, and quite Thank you for your submission to r/virtualreality Raydudeboy123!. Its the only vr headset that compete with Solid tripples) A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. It's already clear CPU bottle-necked in my config. And that scares them. Basically between an RTX 2070 and 2080. That's all. Have to double our power from the GPU is BS. used Hey, VR enthusiasts! We all remember SLI and its promise of superior performance through multi-GPU setups. The only real aspect where AMD is worse or VR really had legs was if you were playing PCVR on a Quest and thus video encoder chip matters a lot. And even at stock, the Vega 56 can do better than the 1070 in VR. . For entry level vr 3050 should be fine though. Running the F15 free Hahah. But yeah, your approach is not right. My current setup is: Ryzen 7 5800x, 32 gb ram 3600, Strix RTX 2080 Super, 750w Power supply. When i swapped motherboard to use 5800x3D (this x3D part is very good for Unity games because it can use caching part better) i can survive much better busy worlds and i can see GPU can do more because it reached easy 100%. If you plan another update in the future I would update GPU now, and CPU when 5800X 3D are available/cheaper (most likely with release of 7x00X 3D), GPU prices has fallen a lot, 6800xt and 3070ti was already below 600€ here in Germany at some point in the past month, I would wait Hi, I was looking to buy a top-end GPU for sim-racing in VR and the Sapphire Toxic 6900 xt caught my eye, which is selling for AUD$1199 and is the same price as the cheapest 6900 xt which is the ASUS TUF model. is the gold standard fir racing VR but it’s very CPU sensitive and the frame drops have a higher impact than non-VR. It also doesn't use much of the GPU either. I’m guessing the quadro m2200 is the bottleneck here. For most VR combinations, AMD has fixed things on prior generations of GPUs after a bit. Most VR games don't leverage DLSS or any NVIDIA only features so for VR it's more about just having a bit more power. There are already a few PCVR games that support Running a 1080ti for years with my Reverb G1 it has been decent, however I was looking forward to the release of the RTX 40xx and the RX7900s. They make laptops with 4090 GPU now, so yes there definitely is a good Nvidia laptop GPU that can handle those games. I cannot justify spending the BeamNG. The easier way to approach it is state a budget and a use case. If you plan on playing mostly VR id suggest ditching the bells and whistles of Nvidia like DLSS and RTX which have zero support in VR and go for an AMD card. Every game will be different so it's impossible to "max out every game". Youll get more raw performance over an rtx card. Like I said, 1060 6gb (or 1660) is the bare minimum. GPU choice is determined by monitor resolution and desired perf. I'm gettings constant stuttering 100% of the time, and I can never hit 90fps, it's always hovering between 60 and 75fps. But if you can upgrade only one I would say go for a better GPU, you can use higher graphics settings and optimize game for CPU more. Also played ALYX half -life. It just really sucked at VR. 3060, 70, 80, etc is good. This is a lot of data that has to go back and forth from the CPU to the GPU, and is also For example the Harry potter game may need like two more gens of GPU and CPU to where its an optimal performance and visual experience in VR. I have a vive pro eye and I get really low fps in some VR games like Assetto Corsa, fpsVR shows me that I have many dropped frames for some reason. Or check it out in the app stores   Which GPU is better for VR? I have a limited budget so this is the most I can spend on a GPU. Hi currently I have a hp zbook from 2017 with 32gb ram and intel i7 7th edition. So in this case, steam vr and wireless quest. Edit: and tweak the fuck out of your settings! Triples >>> VR. This'll also give you headroom to try out other more intensive titles should they catch your eye. (If you truly want VR, Big screen beyond has the best VR headset on the market more or less. You choose your framerate target and then tweak the settings to match. It has something to do with not being plugged into your gpu. Finally getting resolution and frames I wan't in games I play. Hi, i have a rift s and i realised i have to upgrade my pc. The 3d VCache in Ryzen x3d chips immensely helps with performance of games and VR titles. 1080 works fine as well as that is what is in my desktop and there should be some good deals right now. Google Earth VR - No performance issues. When I'm playing VR and it lags, the GPU is reaching high utilization and not the CPU. The true reason why the big companies don't create anything in VR is cause VR gives you freedom. I looking at the RTX 3070 with 8gb vram and the 6700 xt with 12gb vram. Everything else is there to allow the first 2 to run at max perf. Which should I choose, price is about the same, but clock speed is different, and I don't know much about PC components but what is best to go after, ram or speed Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. So yes, amd GPUs are garbage for VR, and the drivers do not work fine. I’m able to run assetto corsa in vr on low with about 35 fps. This chart reflects how powerful cards are for regular gaming, but there's more things to consider for VR use. I'm currently on the lookout for a GPU that can handle VR gaming (using my Quest 3 headset) and entry-level machine learning tasks. Combine that with the current situation where Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. GPU is the most important in factor in how well a computer can run VR. Hopefully a Quest 3 in Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. So depending on your budget you’re looking at a 3000 or 4000 series Nvidia. But don't expect miracles, because once you start going to 2k - 4k resolution, your GPU becomes more important - especially in VR and the G2, because SteamVR renders the image higher than the stock res, to correct the distortion Like I can't imagine a more cost-effective and powerful gpu for VR. 2600X should still be fine for 80% of all VR games. 2080ti is ass at raytracing now $1200 gpu btw. For example, the 3000 series had some messy VR issues for a while after Open FSR is not half bad and can be integrated into any VR title made by Unity and UE, that being said the thing you're going to be suffering from the most is encoding performance especially if you're thinking of recording VR footage since encoder needs to do the Quest 2 encoding and the recording encoding at the same time, which could force you to use CPU encode on AMD gpus. Also, the 7000 series amd cards seem to have a lot of issues with VR. As an owner of a 4090 i can assure you, that even this gpu's limits can be found quickly in VR. Run by Fans of the Worlds Leading Motorsport Simulation Game. There's a lot of processing with everything going through a USB instead of a display port. The 4080 Super or 7900 XTX? Specifically, given the state of AMD vs NVIDIA and that DLSS isn't applicable in VR; and that the 7900XTX offers 24gb VRAM vs the 4080 Super's 16. Though my old cpu was quite old. VR is heavy on your GPU and will use as much ram as you'll let it ime. Since no GPU atm is strong enough to handle VR. DLSS is also superior upscaling. 3060 is minimum. You will probably get better lower fps, minimum fps, etc. Wasn't enough upgraded to RTX 2070 upgraded to 6800 XT. After using those 3 cards, I can honestly say that Nvidia is just better in VR. ACC, for example, is more GPU sensitive and is horrible on general from a VR perspective. The extra cache layer makes an incredible difference in VR. Yup was the Rift CV1 and most games were much less advanced than today but my point stands. Currently I am using a GTX 970 which is basically unusable for VR and the only "better" graphics card (and keep in mind, the GTX970 is a 7 year old card at this point) I was able to find that was frequently in stock were the GTX16XX, however only for +500€ and I think those cards are barely enough for VR and probably not enough at all for the With i7-8700k, GPU is around 60%, so i knew GPU is still powerful enough. For example, 100% resolution on Valve Microsoft Flight Sim is probably the only thing that could do more GPU, though it's still playable in VR. 1440p or 4k? CPU choice is determined by previous GPU choice. VR brings us total awareness. Is this still a thing? What would be a good gpu for my use case for around 500€? VR gaming is very bandwidth hungry. Msfs isn't too greedy when it comes to gpu on a single screen compared to X-plane, which is basically unplayable on any late 7000 series gpus from AMD, whereas msfs is quite playable in VR even on cards like the RX480 etc and looks and feels a ton better. Throw in all that conspiracy and you have, your answer in why they refuse the market. Hey all, I'm looking to upgrade my PC for VR gaming and the Valve Index, hopefully getting somewhere between 60-100 FPS at decently high game settings. drive is a realistic and immersive driving game, offering near-limitless possibilities and capable of doing just about anything! BeamNG in-house soft-body physics engine simulates every component of a vehicle 2000 times per second in real time, resulting in realistic and high-fidelity dynamic behavior. A neutral zone for fans of all VR devices, specifically made for discussion about virtual reality gaming. Most stuff in vr isnt overly hard to run. Members Online. It seems you're new here, so we'd like to introduce you to some helpful community resources: Discord Channel: Connect with fellow VR enthusiasts in our vibrant Discord community!From events to giveaways and a dedicated support section, you'll find plenty to engage with. I forgot there is a RTX Quadro 4000 GPU which is meant for work computers and are better in some stuff compared to the gaming GPUs, but you should not buy that. There's no reasonable choices in current market - just get whatever you can without overpaying ridiculous amount. GPU will show the most benefit and upgrading your CPU means upgrading your MB which adds more money. Problem is, you PC is kinda okey build without any major bottleneck in VR, so for best results you should upgrade both. Specifically, I'm focusing on working on audio generation within the ML field, but only starting. VR isnt going to run well in ACC unless you get a threadripper and 3090+ You need to be able to run the game at a consistent fps matching the refresh rate or else you will get massive stuttering, distortion, and motion sickness. I don't know all the details but VR is much more CPU intensive than I don't think the GPU is causing or contributing to these issues, except that it is perhaps overpowered for my system and revealing where my system is lacking the most. An RX 550 may be able to handle some lower end VR titles but will likely not be able to manage a reasonable frame rate for Half-Life. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. I recently got an i7-1200k , and am looking for a matching GPU, which brought me here! The 3060 ti seem like a good compromise between a good performing card and trying to future-proof your purchase. Please read the Guide and check the FAQ before asking questions. Why? Because you are sending images of about 1. My main use is VR gaming (mostly MSFS2020). I'd get a 6800XT if you're mainly playing VR, because you won't get much out of Nvidias DLSS and Raytracing benefits in VR. I run a 1070ti gpu but spent money on a cpu over gpu and saw a big increase in performance. However, it often fell short due to synchronization issues, software support, and the inefficiencies of inter-GPU communication. On "minimum" Vs "recommended" specs for VR games: most VR games have actually only one set of System Requirements. You do need steam base stations for tracking otherwise it wont work. But I can't max out heavy games like Resident Evil 8 VR mod, fully modded Fallout 4 VR, Cyberpunk VR mod, etc. 5800X3D is 100000% the CPU you want for VR gaming. The 7900xtx was great at regular gaming. And mind the fact that the 4090 is a strong enough gpu to be able to use its computing for military purposes. I heard that Nvidia is still way better than AMD in terms of vr gaming. OP: You seem to be pretty knowledgeable when it comes to recent AMD GPUs so you probably have a pretty good grasp already on what to buy. 6 x 1080p each (or more) at least 90 times per second to each eye. you can get so much more gpu used on your local classified. dont ask reddit, do some basic research. If you upgrade your CPU your GPU will bottleneck you hard in VR. It likely won't matter however, considering VR is far heavier on your GPU in most cases. I like to think that means I am a bit future-proofed and can just bump up my RAM or drop a new CPU in to get decent improvement going forward. I have the old Oculus headset, but preordered the new Meta 3. The 3090 is too expensive for a gaming only card, as I don't use GPUs for workstation tasks the vram would be a waste, but I think 10gb of vram isn't enough for future proofing so the 3080 takes a back seat, and the equal or better performance of the 6900XT in raw frametimes in Depends a lot on what game you want to play. My budget is max 600 dollars so i’m asking what cpu and gpu i should get. Source: Been working with VR since 2016 (early adopter before that) and owned tons of different machines and VR headsets. I'd probably buy the 6900XT then over anything else. Has that changed with new drivers "AMD cards produce notably worse image quality due to a much less capable encoder. VR is more demanding than 4K, even on older headsets. I want to buy a new CPU, because the R3 bottlenecks the GTX 1660s . Build Question Share lets assume AMD's numbers are accurate. The build is strictly a gaming PC. And for regular gaming, I did. I went from a 5600X to a 5800X3D (same gen upgrade) and it was a MASSIVE improvement in VR basically across the board. Get as much GPU as you can afford for the best experience, and if you're using a Quest 2, avoid AMD. And in the case of FO4VR even the "recommended" specs are a joke. For normal 1440p gaming 8gb seems more then enough right now but I know vr uses more vram because higher resolution. For me GTX 980 wasn't enough, upraded to Vega 64. And I think a lot of the people that say it's fine haven't tried VR gaming on a Nvidia card. The other person is trying to sound like a 4060ti wont run what he wants but itll run every game made in vr as of today. That does not mean, that you need it, to have fun in vr. Reply reply Correct. For general gaming with ray tracing I'd get the 3080 with 12GB it will perform great in VR, ray traced games and has the edge with DLSS(even if FSR has gotten a bit better by now the support for DLSS is larger). I want to use my PC for VR gaming and some basic game Dev What would you recommend for a budget of 100-190 €. The more sytlized games are going to be easier to run where the more realistic games will be much harder. Your GPU and CPU should be absolutely fine, though. But, if you want the 7000 series, I would absolutely wait for the X3D variants that are surely right around the corner. Games I play: ETS2 VR, Fallout 4 VR, skyrim VR, No man's sky VR, and elite dangerous. Right now, the 7800x3d stands as one of the best CPUs for VR and Flat screen gaming. the 3080 will be shit at ray tracing in the So if you're like me with a 3700X which has 8 cores, 6 - 7 of them are usually idle while playing VRChat. I have a rtx 2080 adn run all vr games but 2 well. Or check it out in the app stores   if the options for a new GPU were these: RTX4060Ti with 16Gb VRAM for RTX4080 with 16Gb VRAM for 1400€ (EDIT: Not 1080, obviously. In cpu side, 7800x3D considered the best right now, but honestly, all modern cpus are probably fine. A 3090 can be a decent option tho. 24GB of VRAM is incredibly useful and will continue to be for many years to come, unless it dies. Edit: just a side note, you may want to consider using a bottle neck calculator (calculate for graphically intensive tasks) to ensure the disparity between your GPU and CPU won't be a bother. It will struggle in most VR games. Welcome to the Unofficial iRacing Reddit Community. I found a Ryzen 5 3600 at 75€, but it's not that powerful compared to my GPU and I don't want to have to upgrade it soon. 1060 to 1070 is a waste of money like others have stated and just got for a 1080ti. GPU clock speed isn't really something that people compare on anymore. serve you better and further future proof you if your budget allows. But I just started looking, so that that advice with a grain of salt. Even now. The minimum would be those with 4C/4T, but you won’t have the best time with VR games that can use FSR will work with any video card, but any that use DLSS will require Nvidia. Not sure at this point if the bottleneck is CPU or GPU but I’m betting it’s latter. And based on Babeltech review the new 6600XT is actually a worse VR performer than 3060, despite being a more powerful card. Do notice though that Intel seems uses higher TDP which equals higher temps to manage. The hardware has to drive separate images for each lens, and this effectively double I'm looking at getting at 5700x3d and 7900gre PC setup and I was wondering if getting at Nvidia card is better for vr! I'm in the $600 range for My friend told me that AMD cards generally perform worse for VR than Nvidia, like for example apparently the 6900XT on average beats the 3090 in gaming on desktop, but If you want better VR sessions, look for 6-core and 12-thread or 6C/6T processors. Regularly playing Elite Dangerous in VR with it smoothly, though that's To create the VR experience, most HMDs utilize two displays—one for each eye lens. 24gb VRAM and more cheaper on VR gaming is indeed about as demanding as 4K gaming, especially on newer, higher-resolution headsets like the Quest 2 or Reverb G2. I really just want a PC that is mobile so I can take it to a friend's house or in the living room. Posted by u/[Deleted Account] - No votes and 11 comments Your budget for a VR GPU should be as big as possible. It still won't be at the same performance as the desktop 4090 though - and the same goes for all laptop versions of their GPUs. Would it be possible to run with better graphics and post processing with an egpu that actually is vr ready , connecting it to thunderbolt? As for GPU - nVidia 3060Ti is the best value mid-range GPU right now, but good luck finding one at MSRP. I'm also not sure if this was a CPU or GPU performance issue, didn't bother checking) Hyperbolica VR - No performance issues (at least from the part I played in VR). For example, AMD Vega series were notoriously bad VR performers. In VR, even with the Quest 2, we're often targeting much higher combined resolution than 4K and a high refresh rate, and we're seeing a misalignment between the rate at which the panel resolution and refresh rate of our VR headsets increase versus advancements in raw compute power of our GPUs. They don't test wireless so it won't go into the encoder problem AMD has with Quest headsets, but they will tell you how AMD cards compare to Nvidia for everything else. This helps to create the immersive illusion that makes VR what it is, but it is also a big part of what forces you to buy powerful PC hardware for VR. Lighter games are fine though. It runs fine for about 15-20 mins and then it starts to stutter horribly wherein I’ve to restart DCS. I like physics based games like boneworks, blade and sorcery or half life. Hardware Review - Why Used 3090 May Be The Best "Value" GPU Upgrade for VR Experiences Like many others, I was attracted by 3070, for $499 you get a card that is almost as fast as 2080TI! /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude It's hard to find benchmarks for VR games, which are my biggest priority, especially since the 7900XT is paired against the 4070Ti most of the time (and it beats the 4070Ti hands down on most non-RT games), but my concern is that AMD GPU drivers have been infamously bad for VR, and only recently have I been seeing a few people praising their Ideally, 16gb VRAM GPU (Nvidia is the safe bet, AMD maybe, I don't know). It really boils down to the game. The PS5 essentially comes with a 5700 XT equivalent GPU. Sorry :D ) Consider gaming to be only VR, with a Quest 2 via Virtual Desktop. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. honestly if im gonna pay that much for a gpu might as well just save up a bit more and go for a 3070 or 3080 Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. As soon as I start up steamvr (VR home disabled) my 7900XT GPU usage jumps to 70%, leaving no headroom to launch any game. And that is for a reason, as I said, you don't want to advertise "barfing specs". But if you want it to be ideal, go for 8C/16T processors. I've been watching alot of videos and trying to decide on buying a prebuilt or building a new system. 6700 xt is likely the best bang for buck VR and retro games GPU currently, but prices vary and sometimes the used market does But textures are loaded in GPU memory, so you need a lot of that as well. Please read the rules before posting. I mean, the most sensible for VR is the best gpu. 7000 series will ofc. What GPU/CPU combo is going to be best for VR with an approximate budget of $2500. That's an extremely cherrypicked claim. Hey all recently built my first pc and kind of regretting my decision on the GPU I decided on a 4070ti (did not pay full price only paid 200 out of pocket) as the prices for new cards are inflated and I honestly can't find a really good deal in the used market. So raw specs wise, that's about where it's GPU falls. If you got the G2 / 4k-VR MSFS and ACC, the big ones in CPU and GPU requirements just barelly make the 90fps with lowered game imo, should be based on application and vr: 4090+varjo aero is top bundle, perfectly matched; you can update gpu in case of increasing resolution, but cpu is number one priority for sims (iracing, war thunder, dcs) without good cpu there The amd bundle which comes with AMD Ryzen 7800x, a b650 motherboard and 32gb ram i told him i want to upgrade for vr gaming. I have been VR gaming since the beginning. Tested this with in game setting set to absolute minimum, all other programs closed, followed VR setup guide, talked with iracing support (all they did was send over a new graphics settings file which did nothing), no windows game mode, 32gigs I'm looking for a good MOBO and GPU for an ITX or Mini ITX build that is explicitly for VR and the very occasional flat screen game. zero tolerance for self promotion, That said part of the reason dual GPU support is dying is due to the difficulty of adding it to modern render pipelines, some of those issues should be mitigated in VR funilly enough but the greater point still stands. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets AMD is the way to go for non ray traced stuff. Help choosing new gpu for Vr I REALLY wanted to like AMD. A CPU upgrade will be the cheapest, and easiest. Remember the 40 series is a AI and ray trace product. no vr games use raytracing, no games run fine on current hardware , 3060 is close to lowest setting for vr, even 3090 can not run some vr games fine, vr in generals ask about 6 time more performance vs 2d dlss actualy a lot of games and vr perf tool use amd FSR , not dlss, amd tech is way way more popular Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I have a RX 5600XT which isn't the greatest card, but even when VRChat is tanking from a lot of So I'm looking at a new GPU now the prices are finally dropping. For vr which doesn't rely on DLSS or ray tracing a 40 series will perform the same or maybeb25% better due to architecture improvement. The only way a 3090 wouldn't be good for VR is if your goal is to run multiple games at once and mine crypto at the same time. However, it's extremely hard to compare console hardware to PC hardware due to the difference in polish and optimization in software on consoles. Hey, looking for feedback from people who have used AMD GPU's for Sim racing and/or VR in general Lots of mixed reviews online but a lot of the bad ones seem to be people bashing AMDs older gpus driver issues which they seem to have sorted So i have recently bought a Quest 3 and am now considering on building a new pc because my current one is quite old (works with a 1060 ti) and probably not good enough for high quality pcvr. From your list the 7900XT is the fastest option, though in 1k$ one can usually get a 7900XTX. I decided to stop playing at that point because HITMAN in VR was a bit janky. These 3000 series GPUs were released a year ago but they have been really hard to get and the prices are crazy due to the chip sjortage. There may come a point where multi-GPU support for VR can be baked into game engines but we're far off from that. Most people just go on the model of GPU. Babel Tech Reviews does the only GPU reviews with a VR focus. "Budget GPU" might make people recommend barely adequate at lowest settings and half-resolution GPUs. 0 or Microsoft Flight Ideally 4080 or 4090 because of VRAM which it could be very beneficial for VR depending of your settings and the game. Anything that is absolutely not useful like trees etc are disabled. So thats more money. You don't need that much power for Beat Saber or other VR games that are being ported over from Quest 2, but for a Racing or Flying Sim with realistic graphics (Dirt 2. I'd recommend going for an RTX card for the extra horsepower to avoid stuttering and whatnot (2060 and up). Luke Ross made the best VR mod. Not a traditional GPU improvement the likes of Kepler to Maxwell or Maxwell to Pascal. Where im confused is, i was told the gpu was always the most important, but he suggest i stay with my 2700 super gpu to cut cost and just buy the bundle with the new ddr5 cpu, new motherboard and new 32 gbram. Does that 5fps improvement justify paying a premium? For many it does. I also believe you must use the steam knuckle controlers. But if you can afford - lets say - a 4070 and ask yourself if a 3070 would do the job too, go for the more powerful card. Or check it out in the app stores you do realize ray tracing is just a gimmick right? your gpus ray tracing performance becomes nearly obsolete shortly after the next gen gpus are launched. DCS VR runs smooth enough for me if I use Low graphics settings. Best path is to wait until the drivers get fixed. And for what it's worth, initial launch of NVidia GPUs has often had VR issues as well (but they tend to be fixed a bit more rapidly). Look at the other games they tried and the 1070 smokes Vega 56 by a huge margin, then look at this much more comprehensive VR benchmark to counteract outlying, misrepresenting results. " this is soo BS, you probably never have AMD and nvidia gpu to compare ,i am someone who have a lot of GPU and headset, is more or less a same, if you can notice difference is because you use bad setting or bad app like oculus app for AMD is shit, but VD or similar look more or less a same Hey my PC needs a better graphics card to be able to run VR, and I'm looking at two right now, a ASUS Radeon RX 6600 Dual 8gb and a GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS 12G OC 12gb. Don't get lost in the sauce of Nvidia's marketing; the 4000 series is good, but even people with RX 580s are running VR rn. Yep, the GPU market is insane. Running perfectly with a 1070. (Settings and resolution were left as default. What's better for VR. You can find the AMD equivalents at a GPU comparison website. In which case you will want an Nvidia gpu as they are better at video encoding. 4080 is brand new and any 90 series is just unacceptably high budget. pjs vnbpn hmfvui ygbm xfksk iwlhlh sdynqx ktcl wvoxnqu ljr rjdem jhsbd cojv ectlv ruob