Qubes vs whonix reddit. Whonix isn’t amnesiac.

Qubes vs whonix reddit A million percent Qubes is the way. Whonix isn’t amnesiac. They will excel at different things. If you just want to be anonymous from a technical perspective they're all great choices. Mar 26, 2014 · Whonix consists of two virtual machines, a gateway and a workstation. Huge attack surface. Qubes is a perfect addition to Whonix if you can afford having a dedicated computer for it. if your Firefox gets hacked it only infects that one VM and your email client is safe) Whonix's strength is that one VM is setup like a proxy that will only communicate through TOR. What is the exact difference here? I am asking because Fedora and Virtualbox are surely easier to operate. And if the host gets compromised you're done for. Whonix focuses on Anonymity. Security: Qubes' security is the highest you can get and probably even better than Tails. (If you know more about the security aspect of Tails in comparison to Qubes, please tell me). Tails is much simpler and for most people this makes it a better choice, even if qubes is more secure in general. Whonix mostly separates the network access from the rest of the system, using two VMs I think. Whonix has more compatibility. Plus the isolating proxy design of Whonix is even more resistant to leaks than Tails, because it's impossible to even send a packet from whonix workstation that isn't routed Qubes focuses on Security. TAILS: Qubes-Whonix is better situated to protect against IP leaks, but doesn’t attempt to remove forensic evidence from your computer if it’s searched. With that solution, I will have 2 users: I'm having Whonix in both cases and I'm having separate IDs (VMs) through Virtualbox and the different Qubes. Is it worth it / necessary? Probably not. En comparant les deux, je crois comprendre qu’il y a un petit compromis. Qubes is probably gonna be the easiest for day to day use Whonix is also capable of being used in an amnesic way like tails, and this is built-in for qubes using disposable VMs, so you get practically all the benefits of Tails. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. Tails is better at removing forensic evidence of its use on a computer So it’s up to you, but Qubes-Whonix is probably better for most people The point is if your whonix-workstation is compromised, the attacker cannot determine your IP because the whonix-workstation doesn't know it and can only get network from whonix-gateway which runs everything over Tor. They do different things and so one isn’t just plain ‘better’ than the other. Using Devuan instead of Whonix for Whonix gateway seems like a bad idea as all the benefits of Whonjx besides Tor are lost. Is something like debian using xen with whonix more secure than qubes os? No, because that's just DIY Qubes, and DIY Qubes won't be more secure than actual Qubes unless you happen to be better than the Qubes dev team. I use qubes and I would like to know why I should start using kicksecure intsead of whonix. A degree above that would be to use Qubes-Whonix (which is what I just recently moved to). In result, Whonix and Kicksecure have the same security features. (I did plan to route tor traffic twice but I have seen people say that's bad for opsec I didn't get why but since it could be bad for opsec I am not doing it) From what I've gathered, my hardware isnt compatible with Qubes (no iGPU and I'm not keen to jerry-rig a GPU passthrough) and more importantly, my threat model isnt as severe as what Qubes has set out to do. g. Aug 3, 2023 · I use all distros of linux, tails, qubes, whonix all the time. My experience: *Tails is best when travelling overseas and using untrusted wifi routers. Tails has less application and service sandboxing and separation. QUBES + WHONIX: Anonymity: Anonymity with Whonix is great. Entirely different threat model; it's simply that whatever is running in one container can't interact with others. I really like Qubes Very secure yet very user friendly. Qubes OS is a security-oriented operating system that allows you to compartmentalize your data and activities into isolated environments called "qubes" so that a single cyberattack can't take down your entire digital life in one fell swoop. If Qubes has significant upside in comparison to the Fedora + Virtualbox setup though, I'd consider digging into it. At first I hated this then I realized it actually is safer. The second virtual machine can be any OS. Si je comprends bien, Qubes/Whonix a un meilleur anonymat mais laisse des traces sur votre disque dur là où Tails a un peu moins d'anonymat mais ne laisse aucune trace. Be professional, humble, and open to new ideas. Once the system is off, everything will start from 1. It doesn't necessarily have to be the Whonix-Workstation. The default Non-Qubes-Whonix and Qubes-Whonix platforms will fall to this attack, the same as attack number six. I wouldn't recommend running Whonix with your personal OS as host because you're likely running a lot of applications with potential zero-day exploits. Tails is going to satisfy most people’s threat model just fine. I installed Qubes 4. *Qubes works well day to day browsing but chucks a wobbly when I try and use my printer. […] Personally between qubes on whonix for general use I'm always gonna pick qubes. Everything was more difficult and slower due to the compartmentalisation system. Aug 7, 2024 · Edit: actually this post on the Whonix forum (by the founder and lead develoepr of both Whonix and Kicksecure) sounds pretty conclusive: Kicksecure is security-focused operating system. Keep in mind, Proxmox doesn’t offer the same level of isolation enforcement that Qubes does. However, the learning curve for using Qubes is intense. All of them use Tor/onion. Whonix vs Kicksecure I have just found about kicksecure and I'm very interested in using it. The attacker would have to break out of whonix-workstation into the host OS or compromise whonix-gateway as well. Physical isolation defeats this attack in the same manner as per attack Oct 19, 2021 · Qubes’ security is the highest you can get and probably even better than Tails. TAILS is intended to be run from a USB, the other two are not, I think. Qubes + whonix is more secure against malware, but Tails is better for people who struggle with linux style operating systems. Jan 20, 2024 · Whonix, Linux Kodachi, and Tails are probably your best bets out of the 5 options considered. Do you have decades of education and experience specializing in virtualization security, low-level system security, secure operating system design, Xen, the Linux kernel, etc . Qubes is an OS that is meant to be installed, has whonix installed by default (but you can turn it on and off) and runs every program in a completely different virtual machine for the sake of isolation (e. Qubes/Whonix attempts to gain the advantages of Qubes and Whonix. Whonix is an anonymous operating system and based on, hardened by Kicksecure. You can even have disposable whonix or fedora VMs, so you use them and they get completely wiped when you close Firefox or Tor or whatever. The reason being, everything you do on Tail OS is stored in RAM. The short answer is that Tails is primarily focused on privacy and anti-forensics, whereas Qubes-Whonix is primarily focused on privacy and security. The level of security would be increased due to the pre-configured core component isolation Qubes offers. Qubes mostly separates your apps from each other, putting each in a separate VM, at the expense of convenience. 1 Live ISO on a DVD/USB and use the Integrated Whonix VMs there. Qubes is great, but Qubes v. Excellent for keeping emails in their own VM. The website uses a known or zero day vulnerability to gain remote code execution on the user's machine. Bottom line, with Tails you can be up and running in an hour or two, where Qubes you are going to have to invest some time learning it. You need to decide whats important to you QUBES + WHONIX: Anonymity: Anonymity with Whonix is great. 4 on the horizon seeks to end paravirtualization which will increase security but will make hardware profiling easier. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Qubes sera certainement un meilleur choix pour votre système d'exploitation quotidien. A community of individuals who seek to solve problems, network professionally, collaborate on projects, and make the world a better place. Using a terminal only gets rid of a lot of practicality and only improves security by reducing attack surface in case there is a bug in you DE, it will probably make it less secure practically as it is easier to get confused. Is there any distro between Fedora and Qubes on the "security vs convenience" spectrum? They’re built around different use cases and sample threat models. Is Qubes/Whonix safer? Yes. Identities: Different identities can easily be achieved through different Whonix VMs. You can have fedora and whonix app VMs in qubes, so you get the best of all worlds. The Whonix-Gateway can be installed in a virtual machine to route all traffic through tor from any other virtual machine. TAILS: A user visits a website over Tor with a torified Browser. Tails is quicker and easier to setup. So the system you're using simply cannot contact clear net accidentally Qubes, by default, doesn't force communication through TOR. 1 on the Dell, I gave up because it really hurts my productivity. Qubes has a torVM that uses whonix so unless your worried about battery life Qubes just gives you everything plus more. If you like the amnesic aspect of Tails, yet want ultimate security, I would do this: Install Qubes 3. On a darknet magazine known as Livedarknet, I read that Tail OS is better than Whonix and Qubes. Currently I run tails on a vm but I plan to change my os to qubes and run tails on that with mullvad vpn routing all traffic before it reaches tails. I am thinking of installing Fedora + Whonix instead, as I can use Fedora as a normal development computer. I found a similar post, but that was from 3 years ago. I asked his over in r/Whonix and got this: "You should consider using Qubes which is based on the Xen hypervisor. Not sure if Qubes uses it by default. qnrehfs katemrn lpsg urbxc ldymh igjfgs oqch smglr olt rczax bvyqrk byr qvmx eefnc gyuvjm