Full body vs split reddit. After 20 years, this is the first time doing U/L.
Full body vs split reddit when i didnt push myself, workout is bad) so i switched to upper lower split routine and i can do much more on every muscle group (enough recovery time). Most people don't have time to do that, and so people that do full body usually don't get in nearly as much volume as people that do more specific splits. I've been doing splits (first started with PHUL for 8 months) and not gonna lie, I love how it's easier to make mind-muscle connection and more effective pumps. Intuitively, you want to maximize calorie burn while keeping muscle mass and creating a favorable hormonal response, so the first month of the BuiltLean Program starts off using full body workouts 2x per week with 1 day as a modified split, then the second month switches to a split routine 3x per week with some full body exercises thrown in to My wife and I both do full body. But then I've done a couple of research regarding full body and upper-lower split routines and it looks like doing full body is a better way to build a better foundation as a late novice. In a body part split you might do those sets all in one day, an upper lower split you might spread them over two days (ie 7 sets one day, 8 sets the next) and in a full body split going 3-4 times per week, you might do 3-5 sets per day. Whereas with your current split, you are working your legs every 3-4 days. See full list on barbend. Hello there , so currently I am still on a cut and I follow the Reddit PPL routine. 5 hour in the gym, 3 sets of 8-12 for 5 (varying) exercises, volume spread across the weekyou have to eat a ton (I'm at 4-4. It's kind of silly to have 21 sets (7 exercises) for upper, 16 (5 exercises) for lower, 18 (7 exercises) for full body when with a full body you can distribute volume evenly and have 18-19 sets per day. A body-part split, hitting different body parts over a week is going to train your whole body one (maybe two) times per week, which is 4-8 times per month (48-96 times per year). It compares half of an Arnold split (Chest and back, legs, shoulders and arms) to a 3 day full body routine. Full body: go to the gym two to three times a week and is a good way to get started with 4 3 or 4 day intervals to let the body to repair. After 20 years, this is the first time doing U/L. I'm more interrested, tbh, in the PPL to changes things up. As a beginner, doing a body-part split is not taking advantage of your advanced recovery capabilities. The disadvantages of a full body workout is that different muscle groups recover at different rates, you're often tired and going through the motions at the end of your workout, some muscle groups could benefit from more volume than can be supported in a full body workout, and training full body 3 times per week becomes too much for most people We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Been training for almost 20 years and I've never gone more than a year without circling back to a full body split. Edit: I can confirm, just watched it in more detail. But the i discovered kboges account on youtube. Personally, I tend to go for a compromise and have a lot of both: I'm one of the few who do full body 5x week1. Nov 23, 2023 ยท Then, we’ll go over some of the most common full-body vs split workouts and list the pros and cons of each approach, along with sample training programs for every type of routine. I love a full body split. g. I've always done splits in the past but am getting the best gains of my life doing full body 3x a week. I find it harder to put in the effort trying to do things like Legs, Back, Chest all in the same day. A study published last year had fifty women follow a 12-week strength training program. I do the first day with a strength focus, 2nd day focusing on strength and stretch, and the 3rd day focusing on the The problem with full body splits is that in order to truly hit the FULL body effectively and rest sufficiently between sets, you will have to be in the gym for 3+ hours. , workout 1 back and chest, workout 2 legs, workout 3 shoulders and arms. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. So far I like it. Recently though, I divided each day into two specific muscle groups (for example, pull got divided Into biceps lats & lower back traps) so I can really nail a specific few So i have always been doing an upper lower split and i have stayed away from full body because i read a lot that it was very taxing and hard. The practical ability to perform more volume is an advantage of a split over a full body routine. Whether it is full body or a bro split at this point is up to whatever you think sounds more fun, though you may want to consider that you will be very sore at first and a split will give you longer recovery periods before hitting the same muscle groups again (this won't really matter after a few weeks but may make a difference for your program As Omar noted, the study sucks because that split routine is just extremely subpar. I found it easier to work a split 4 days a week. It a way to ease into it. Not Incline Bench as the lead. com Just moved from full body 5 days a week to upper/lower 4-5 days a week. IMHO, someone at beginner levels would probably benefit more from full body workouts each day as they build overall muscle. Of course the full body routine will produce better results than the 3 day, half Arnold split. I always readed that full body is better etc, but i dont know why it has never worked effectively like other people wrote for me (when i push myself harder,i couldnt recover. I also like to have a lot of variation which you can do on Full Body it's just a bit more limiting. Personally I picked 5 exercises per workout, 4 sets per exercise and ran with it. Is the reason why the RR is a beginner routine because its a full body, or is it because of the exercises within it? The exercises within it. . Depends really. With a full body split I've always liked balancing with opposite exercises to minimize asymmetry. 5+ hrs at once for doing something like the RR becomes challenging. All are welcome to discuss working out in all its various aspects; discuss routines, nutrition, ask for… You have a good point with frequency, and also with muscle imbalance. I've also been lifting 10+ years. I do abs each day, as I use in between sets as time to do ab/core workouts. You will most likely get more strength gains from a full body as a beginner, but that will in turn probably end up to some sort of stalling or plateau. Recently I got into listening to MindPump and they suggested that for natural athletes, a full body routine 3 days a week will trigger more mouscle growth response due to frequency than a split. RDLs I think should be done earlier on that full body day. For me, I can do MUCH more weekly volume through a bro split than I can on a high frequency routine, and so for me it's proven to be much more effective. You will certainly progress much faster when doing exercises 3 times per week instead of once because your CNS will adapt much quicker, so if you are a beginner don't wait and start a FULL BODY routine asap! As long as a full body routine works, stick to it! :) There are a few reasons people choose for splits (and "doing what the pros do" isn't Hello,i think its pretty clear topic. When I started lifting, I would do full body workouts each day at the gym because I was building. 306K subscribers in the workout community. You would have actually have less time to recover in between sessions if you do full body 3x per week. When its time to do a split routine When you are no longer progressing with a whole-body routine, you switch to a split. This gives you room to perform even more volume and variety than a full body routine in comparable workout times. For example, say you want to do 15 sets for glutes per week. I really don't like this split personally. E. 1 I have a harder and more intense Full Body workout 3x a week or PPL Split (Leo Wang Workout). I like full body, but committing to 1. Still doing full body with it, just lowering weight/upping reps on the non emphasized day. I still use a full body workout because I can only hit the gym 3 times a week so it just works better for me. People discredit its hypertrophy potential imo. There was some initial soreness the first 2 weeks but it goes away. 5k now) but you definitely see results. I think the best of both worlds, would be to do full body 3x a week, but make my sessions either a bit longer, or do them faster. Gets kind of boring. But after some research on the web, most of the people say that Splits are for advanced and beginner should do Full Body. At this point I couldn't see myself going back to splits. He basically talks about training everyday with 1 push, 1 pull and 1 leg movement for 3 sets and you can gain muscle and strength. I think it's much better to Full body can be great but it takes a lot more care to program correctly and manage fatigue. Personally, I do Push Pull Legs 2x through a week. In this case it's the usual debate of volume vs frequencysome argue for the former, some for the latter. It's a great place to start, and a great place to circle back to when your progress stalls on PPL or UL split. Full body is typically good for beginners, when you begin to plateau from that, split routines can help break that plateau. With 3 full body days per week, you will be working your legs every 2-3 days. That’s interesting, I was going to say the same thing but in inverse. I’ve been doing an every other day full body program for 6 weeks & I am responding really well to it too. Study: Full-Body vs Upper/Lower Split Workouts for 12 Weeks. You can do full body workouts as an intermediate/advanced athlete just fine. She's twice a week but I do 3 days. Full body = more taxing, more intense, lower volume, better for an early-intermediate novice. IE: 12 sets per week for chest through full body yielded the same results as 12 sets per week on a bro split. My body just really likes the training frequency I guess. hkhgrfswkslsrgrmdxynquwwwsinhcnazdjvhxaatlmchglmixxubuezassrgansgzrnfeyledepcg